I couldn't agree more. The rake/trail of the bike was engineered to specifications that allow the bike to perform properly under normal conditions. To change the fork length, you would need to make other changes to compensate. If you want the shorter fork version of the ridgeback, get a pitbull.why would you want to shorten them? that would throw off the trail of the bike, it would put the frame lower in the front, it would change the flex of the bike making it ride stiffer. overall, IMO, it would screw it up unless you got into changing the angle of the neck. sounds to me like you would be opening a big can of worms.
:nono: I agree with woodwhy would you want to shorten them? that would throw off the trail of the bike, it would put the frame lower in the front, it would change the flex of the bike making it ride stiffer. overall, IMO, it would screw it up unless you got into changing the angle of the neck. sounds to me like you would be opening a big can of worms.
makes sense, might work.Is this the guy who was going to put the 26" wheel on the front? Bigger wheel shorter forks?
Dam good memory!Is this the guy who was going to put the 26" wheel on the front? Bigger wheel shorter forks?
I would hate to form an opinion before seeing it, but I think I would be ugly but that's just me.I was trying to figure out why a guy would shorten his forks and that's the only thing that I could possibly imagine.
