statute is vague
I read the actual statute re: the ban on vertical tags. Typical of our legislature, the statute is vague, and doesn't say what it means. In general, it requires the tag to be displayed "horizontal," but it doesn't define the term.
In addition to being "motorcycle specific" without justification, which may render the statute unconstitutional, it is vague.
Bottom line: I have a vertical tag on my K-9, which is clearly displayed and illuminated as required by law. I am not going to change it, until the courts have evaluated this statute. If I get a ticket, I may be the one asking the court for that evaluation.
I have a vertical tag mounted on the fender on an equipment trailer which protects the tag in the event of a tire blow out. I guess the statute does not apply to the trailer...I wonder why?
Where is the AMA on this?
They are after the rice rocket boys and dipshit "stunters" who fasten their tags to the underside of the rear fender above the rear tire and do wheelies, which is addressed in another section of the same statute. The legislature could have drafted a statute to address these concerns without screwing with law abiding custom bikers.
Now I am pissed off.