Check this out, a 124 c.i. in a Bagger, wow!

Status
Not open for further replies.

SKOGDOG

One of the old ones.
Well I have ridden my 111 Bagger, and I have ridden Blacktopper's hopped up 124, and believe me you'd know the difference right away. This guy is claiming 147 hp.
Not too expensive to have it painted black, but I'd be 'on point' to see who built that engine.
Overall it looks like a heck of a deal.
 

bigkelk9

Well-Known Member
Well I have ridden my 111 Bagger, and I have ridden Blacktopper's hopped up 124, and believe me you'd know the difference right away. This guy is claiming 147 hp.
Not too expensive to have it painted black, but I'd be 'on point' to see who built that engine.
Overall it looks like a heck of a deal.
I haven't rode a 111, but I have rode a 2016 cvo street glide and I'll tell ya, no comparison to the 117 on the k9..
 

Srodden

Well-Known Member
That bike is still belt driven. There is no way a belt would handle that kind of horsepower I call BS.
 

liferider

Looking forward to retirement
When I bought my HD Ultra Classic as y'all might remember. The guy sold it to me thinking the motor was blown. 40K miles on 1996 Ultra Classic. Anyway I had the opportunity to buy a 145 Revtech for $2500.00 it was in a bike that got wrecked with 3000 miles on it. I looked hard at it before rebuilding the EVO motor. The deciding factor was the back bone was 1.25" to low and would hit the heads. Damn I wanted to put that motor in. But I decided on rebuilding and went that direction!
 

cdogg556

Guru
Normal for quite a few bikes out of my shop. Got some in the mid 160's and low 170's All baggers.
John
Makes me wonder what my bike is actually putting out with a 585 cam and V&H exhaust, all I know is its pretty fast, can't imagine it being anywhere near 149 hp.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top