I was told the reason for the sensors bringing on the error is because they are pre-set at 30% of the total range
This is a concept and the abstract goes something like this. Every sensor can swing from 0 to 10. This is called a balanced system. If one sensor drops out, is out of range, shorts to ground, the black box takes on a redundant calc determined by engine speed an the other good sensor's input.
My bike runs great and the plugs are spot on so a P0170 Bad Sites Front DTC doesn't mean much in way of performance and I was told I would not "hurt" the motor if I set it as high at 50% like most tuners do
Correct. No matter the threshold number it still balances out as per handcuffing to the penultimate number of 760mmHg, or 14.7, or 1 atmosphere. This is our 1st number. Crank speed is the other part to the formula.
Usually, when I am accelerating harder than normal to reach the limit of the 30%. This is all confusing and new to me but this is what I have been told by S&S personnel.
If we pulled a sensor wire out it would spit a code. That sensor was not in analog (many numbers sent out), but was more a one hit (continuous) number being sent. That sends up a flag the sensor is down/out of range. Once the analog freezes, the code is sent, the black box takes actions to save the engine from damage or goes rich meaning. It is handcuffed to the truth tables so the calc is more a replica of the calc needing an analog signal out of the black box. This is close enough to be redundant or the 'best' the truth tables calc'd out.
Karnaugh maps, truth tables, and Boolean expressions : Karnaugh Mapping
... because my bike runs great other than the malfunctioning light coming on too often which is electrical and I hate electrical! lol
She-wink-winked at me just now. WATT would happen you install a plastic dowel with a determined hole that pushes into the intake sensor hose. She slows down the pull = No code sent. Damn, I wish someone was close with this setup to find out.

I'm going to take a guess and say it may not come on as much. Want to be the first one to try the restricting dowel trick, see if it works?
I'm not sure where the module (VFI) learns. I know it adjusts to atmospheric conditions, but how do the "limits" I have been told come into play?
Man has to write the limits or the threshold number. Each cell next to each other changes in the learn process. Again, back to the 'best' the truth tables and what it can come up with when a target is set like an AFR.
I believe the P0170 DTC error means there was a malfunction in the computer's control of the air/fuel ratio.
Any enlightenment is appreciated.
Correct. There is something called the 'Method.' The duplicator. The mimic. The Redundant Truth Table it is handcuffed to.
Method = a-N (mid-high range) and D-J (low-mid range). Vacuum sensor controls low-mid. TPS controls mid-high. When the sensor fails or the signal is out of range (30), Digital-Jetronics takes over. A black box is a digital unit. Digital means one so there are only one set values to each part. The analog like a rheostat or the dimmer switch has moving parts and creates many dims to brights. So analog is many, digital is one. Look at the wall switch. It's zero (off) or it's at 100w (on). There is no in between.
If the TPS goes out, a-N kicks in. The a means alpha, N means numeric. So how does the AFR change? Well, not too much on the WOT side, but a safety on the lift side. There is still vacuum pull on both load and lift, but the code takes safety measures or goes rich in the final calc.
This brings up more maps or files written that takes care of this. A computer is told what to do. Like a cad-cam machine. You have to program it to do certain things. There are 2 numbers needed so the truth tables can calc the rest. There is the 760mmHg number (when all else fails) and the crank speed number. These 2 determine the fuel calc in the redundancy. That's why you can't feel any difference when it happens, right? But if you had an AFR meter to see the change on lift, it might show safe rich.
Try that dowel hole deal. I'd be curious to see if the theory pans out? :loony: