Everyone:
I have attached a dyno sheet that shows some fairly respectable numbers. Testing was taking in Nebraska at 2,800 ft of elevation.
The baseline numbers are a 117 with a S&S 600 cam, XXX Carb, V&H 2 into 1 pipe, and powerpacc carb backing plate.
The new results are after changing to a woods 650 cam and springs, Hooker Fourbidden pipe, zero deck height, and Thunderheart Ignition.
A note worth mentioning, is we dyno'ed the bike using the 3, 4, and 5 settings on the ignition and it showed only a small difference between the 4 and 5 but it did not like the 3 at all.
These are numbers with the air filter on, we did gain 3 hp and 2 tq by taking off the air filter
The dyno guy did say the dip is due to the engine needing more back pressure and the normal problems associated with running an Super g carb.
Life's good, run's great
K9 Husker
I have attached a dyno sheet that shows some fairly respectable numbers. Testing was taking in Nebraska at 2,800 ft of elevation.
The baseline numbers are a 117 with a S&S 600 cam, XXX Carb, V&H 2 into 1 pipe, and powerpacc carb backing plate.
The new results are after changing to a woods 650 cam and springs, Hooker Fourbidden pipe, zero deck height, and Thunderheart Ignition.
A note worth mentioning, is we dyno'ed the bike using the 3, 4, and 5 settings on the ignition and it showed only a small difference between the 4 and 5 but it did not like the 3 at all.
These are numbers with the air filter on, we did gain 3 hp and 2 tq by taking off the air filter
The dyno guy did say the dip is due to the engine needing more back pressure and the normal problems associated with running an Super g carb.
Life's good, run's great
K9 Husker

Attachments
-
147.9 KB Views: 616